![]() ![]() The tone of his writing and the strategies he offers more closely resemble Black Power than The Audacity of Hope. Bell takes his inspiration from Paul Robeson, Frantz Fanon, Robert L. But unlike most of what passes as CRT today, Bell’s CRT is actually rooted in the Black Radical Tradition, with explicit roots in Black Nationalism and anticolonialism. Though defenders and detractors alike claim to know what CRT “really” is, none of them have taken care to examine the philosophy of Derrick Bell, a man who is widely considered the “father of critical race theory.” Even Kimberlé Crenshaw, who has been treated as the foremost authority on CRT as of late, once referred to Bell as “as scholar who lit the path toward Critical Race Theory” and one to whom scholars of CRT “owe an enormous intellectual debt.” Some commentators have suggested that Bell’s CRT is a liberal philosophy. The debates about Critical Race Theory (CRT) have raged in Amerika for over a year now. Part 3 presents a critique of intersectionality as an idealist, liberal iteration of CRT. Part 1 provides an overview of the work of Derrick Bell, the “father of critical theory.” Part 2 provides a detailed intellectual history of CRT. This three-part series corrects these misunderstandings. From corporate media and right-wing rags to independent left media, almost everyone has misrepresented or misunderstood the origins, histories, and theories of what is today known as CRT. Recent debates about Critical Race Theory (CRT) have been abysmally uninformed at best and utterly inaccurate at worst. “Bell favored a cyclical view of history in which Black people experience progress through interest convergence and setbacks under racial sacrifice.” ![]() Bell levels a class critique against the Black bourgeoisie, whom he sees as having led Black political protest down the wrong path time and time again. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |